May 18, 2019

John Wall Bobblehead No. 5


For the past couple of years, I've been somewhat less than kind to the Washington Wizards when reviewing their giveaway offerings each fall. It's an exercise that's turned into a strategy (if you can call it that) of handing out a schedule magnet, a bobblehead and a team poster and calling it a year. No imagination, no outside the box thinking, no multiple bobbleheads. It's like they think that fans don't care about useless things being handed out at the doors of Capital One Arena on game night. News flash: we do care!

Most of my ire in the last several years about the freebie schedule has revolved around the Wizards' tired and true (not a typo) approach to bobbleheads, meaning they only give away one each year. Yes, that's right...while the Golden State Warriors, Dallas Mavericks, Milwaukee Bucks or some other franchise is handing out multiple bobbles in any given season, the Wiz are determined to stick with one. Sure, sure, there have been years where there's an extra bobblehead available through the Kids' Club for a fee or through Monumental Rewards (R.I.P.) but there's a cost associated with those above and beyond a game ticket and they appear to have stopped all that anyway. I have no idea why this team doesn't set its sights higher with the promotional schedule.

So given all that, April 5 was likely the most bittersweet Wizards game of the season. First, it was the last game I attended his year which brought the frustration which was this season to an end. I should never be welcoming the end of basketball season, not with a team allegedly this talented. Second, it was bobblehead night which simultaneously made me happy and also pointed out that the Wizards had pretty much only made me this happy on this one night this season, either with their play or due to the fact that no other games had bobblehead giveaways.

Now, one of the perils of just having one bobblehead handed out per year is that the team pretty much creates a no win choice for themselves: make a bobblehead of a popular player or go unconventional and give a role player a shot. The former choice risks the ardent fan having multiple bobbleheads of the same player over and over again; the latter risks nobody bothering to show up explicitly for the bobblehead because nobody knows who the heck the player even is. Of course, this year by the second to last home game of the season, there weren't many Wizards fans there; the San Antonio Spurs fans were way more vocal.

The Wizards, to nobody's surprise, over the years have opted for the first tact, whereby they give away the same players in bobblehead form over and over again. At the beginning of this season, I had on my bobblehead shelves (yes, shelves) four John Wall bobbles, three of Bradley Beal, two Ottos and a Kelly Oubre bobblehead and no other active players on the roster. When the Wizards announced the promotional schedule this year, they didn't name who was on the schedule for April 5, preferring to go with the enigmatic "bobblehead". In all my stupidity I first assumed it would be Dwight Howard but then got my hopes up for Tomas Satoransky or Thomas Bryant.

Of course, it ended up being John Wall. I now have five Wizards-issued John Wall bobbleheads.


So the first and obvious question here is: WHY? Why give us another John Wall bobblehead? If the decision was made at the beginning of the season, why schedule an end-of-season bobblehead for a dude that missed half of last season? If the decision was made during the season, it's even more puzzling with Wall missing more of this season than last season. I know I've already answered these questions earlier in this post (he's the most popular player) but I still don't get it.

Complaining won't do me any good. Let's talk about how I feel about my new bobblehead shall we?

First off, let's deal with the scale of this bobblehead because it's unique in my collection. While it's as tall as a standard sized bobblehead, it's standing on a plinth, which has forced the artist to scale the bobblehead itself down to sort of a three quarters scale model. I don't know that this is necessarily good or bad, it just it what it is.

The plinth has been painted in an attempt to make it resemble marble to match the spirit of Nike's City Edition uniforms which feature a stylized Washington Monument along the side of the uniform to right below the armhole. The plinth also has a Capital One sign (because Capital One sponsored every one of the three giveaways this year), some holes and a button for pressing. We'll come back to that.


Of course, John Wall is sporting the 2018-2019 Wizards City Edition in black with the aforementioned Washington Monument below the armpit and the District of Columbia logo across the chest.  As they have with other recent bobbleheads, the Wiz have opted to do with decals for the detailed wordmark, numbers and nameplate on the uniform in lieu of casting these details into the model and relying on the Chinese workers to skillfully execute the paint job. This strategy generally yields a better product, although it loses some of that unskilled paint application free bobblehead appeal.

If you are worried about the last sentence of the previous paragraph, don't be. There's still plenty of spots on this bobblehead for a sloppy paint job, namely the Washington Monument / stripe down the side of the uniform which looks like someone painted the red and white and then aggressively colored with a grey or silver marker which I assume is supposed to simulate the marble veining on the white part of the stripe. They definitely didn't stay within the lines; the red is covered with grey/silver color.


One of the big tests of the value of a bobblehead is whether the head of the thing actually looks like the player. Sometimes I feel that teams just select any old representative black man's head and hope that works. The 2011-2012 season John Wall bobblehead looks like some kind of crazed elf (second from left in the 5 John Walls pic above).

In this case, I'm going with the likeness being pretty good. The smile is a little off and the chin seems oversized, particularly on the left side of John's face. I guess it becomes inherently a little easier with a beard but John's is rendered so minimally here that it doesn't really contribute to making the head look more or less like John's actual face. But the overall effect is one of John Wall. I can buy it. There are definitely bobbleheads out there that are better but its not the worst of the bunch.

So about that plinth...as you may have guessed, the height, holes and button mean one thing: talking bobblehead. This is not the first time the Wizards have issued a bobblehead with a sound system. The one and only team-issued Gilbert Arenas has a custom recorded message from Agent Zero himself. A couple of years later the team gave away a Phil Chenier / Steve Buckhantz featuring a "Dagger!" call from Steve.

So what's this one? Some words of wisdom from John Wall? Nope. Some kind of confidence-laden statement about D.C. being his city? Not that either, although that would be awesome. In fact, there are no words from John at all on the recording. Instead it's the "Welcome to D.C." song that they play at the games. Kind of lame? Sort of but for me, it's not what bobbleheads are about. I don't press the play button on my Arenas or Phil/Buck bobbleheads too often so it doesn't matter to me. 


Of course, as all Wiz bobbleheads do these days, this one comes in a box covered with stats. OK, so one half of one side has a few stats. Important to me: franchise leader in assists and steals, 2014 Slam Dunk Contest champion and one each All-NBA and All-Defensive team nods. Interesting to me: All-Star point guard. No number of times. Makes me guess this was decided at the beginning of the year.

Also interesting to me: the accurate representation of the Nike jersey template reflected in the seams on the back of the bobblehead. That shows me how far bobbleheads of come. It used to be that you would struggle to recognize the player. Now the jersey seams are accurate. This is also the first bobblehead with the Geico advertising patch on it which I obviously hate. I find it curious the team had to (I'm assuming they did "have to") put that on the bobblehead but didn't have to (or were forbidden from?) putting the Nike swoosh on it. 


Overall, I'm giving this bobblehead a B. This one looks pretty good. It's clearly John Wall and I'm OK having this on my shelf. I just wish it was someone else. And not Bradley Beal either. If there was a reason to mark this down (and I did) it was because the choice of player shows absolutely no imagination whatsoever. Here's hoping next year the Wizards will get things right in the bobblehead department and hand out more than one next year. 

Spoiler alert: they won't. Just a hunch.

May 7, 2019

Season Tickets vs. StubHub? 2019 Report


It's been over a month since I've posted anything on this blog. And while I'm still trying to recover from what has to be one of the most disappointing seasons of my 19 year run as a season ticket holder, I have some things to say to wrap up this season and move on to the next, which hopefully starts with a lucky result in next Tuesday's draft lottery. We can always hope, right?

For the past five years on this blog, I've written an end of season post comparing the cost of Wizards season tickets to the cost of tickets on the secondary market based on my weekly tracking of season ticket prices on StubHub. This year I'm not doing that. Instead I'm just going to write about my own personal experience owning and selling Wizards season tickets in two locations in the building (Sections 109 and 415). And yes, I know the title of this post is now wrong.

I'm changing my reporting here for two reasons. First, I just couldn't be bothered to track this data every month or every week. It's just too much effort for a team that didn't exhibit much effort out on the court. Or in other words, I just don't have the data. Second, this is the first season since I've been tracking the value of my tickets that I've been underwater, where what I paid yielded less than the value of the dollars shelled out.

How do I measure that, you might ask? Here's how:

Let's say I have two pairs of tickets to a Wizards game: one in Section 109 which cost me $192 (2 tickets at $96 each) and one in Section 415 which cost me $80 (2 tickets at $40 each). Let's say I manage to sell my upper deck tickets for $28 and use the other two to go to the game. The value of that game for me is $192 because that's the cost of the seats that I am actually sitting in. I only recovered $56 on the two tickets I sold so therefore my cost for $192 of value is $216, meaning I took a $24 loss. 

I track every game like that for the entire year and then measure whether I won or lost money on the season. Every season I have tracked this, my value has been equal to or slightly greater than my cost, except this year when I took a loss of $307.

The month of March 2019. Possibly the most disastrous month ever from a Wizards value standpoint.
How did this happen, you might ask? Well broadly speaking and without citing any specific facts for now, the bottom fell out of the Wizards ticket market this year when the bottom fell out of the season, which happened in like November. Honestly, unless you wanted to go see the Warriors or Lakers games, this season's tickets were available for cheap (and certainly less than season ticket holders paid for them) on the secondary market. Too much supply and little demand. Folks lost interest in this season pretty quickly when the team started underperforming worse than they usually do to start a season. No winning, no attendance. Not this year.

Now for some specifics:
  • This year I sat in my Section 415 seats just four times, meaning I sold or tried to sell 36 regular season games (the Wiz only had 40 home games this year due to the Londan game being a home game) and three preseason games. My total cost for those 39 games was $3,320. My return on trying to sell those tickets got me $1,492. These things have no value most games. The team selling them at $40 per regular season seat is far, far above market value. 

  • There were just eight games this year where I sold tickets for more than I paid in Section 109 (Houston, Boston, the Lakers, Philadelphia, Golden State, Milwaukee, Miami and San Antonio). In the upper deck, that number dropped to five (the Lakers, Toronto, Golden State, Miami and Boston).  

  • There were six games in the upper deck that I couldn't sell at all, not even for $5 to me and a cost of $7 to the buyer. That means that there was nobody willing to buy my seats for a lousy $7. $7!!!! The six games by the way were Orlando, the Clippers, Charlotte, Sacramento, Orlando again and Utah.

  • I took a trip out of the country in March and had to miss the first six games of that month which unfortunately for me were not very sell-able. My cost for these six games? $1,632. My return via selling on the secondary market? $594.50. That's a loss of $1,037.50 over a two week period.

  • I sold my lower level seats to the Orlando game on March 13 (which was one of the six games in the bullet above) for $25 each, a loss of $71 per seat.

  • The overall numbers would have been way worse if it wasn't for the Miami game on March 23 and the Boston game on April 9. I actually made money on the Miami game just because (in all likelihood) it was Dwyane Wade's last game in D.C. In all likelihood refers to the reason I likely sold at a profit, not the likelihood it was Wade's last game in Washington. And the Boston game? Some fool paid me $60 per ticket for my upper deck seats only to be at a game where the entire roster of the Celtics sat out to rest for the postseason.

This is not a good set of stats for the Wizards season ticket holder.

To the Wizards' credit, I guess, they elected not to raise season ticket prices this year. I am sure the team has a lot of data similar to what I've presented above and I'm pretty positive they had lots of anecdotal information about how angry a good portion of the season ticket holder base was and is about the state of the franchise. Raising ticket prices would have been suicide, even with the firing of Ernie Grunfeld out there.

I also appreciate the fact that the team allowed me to renew my lower level tickets, which all things considered could sell pretty well (except in March of 2019) most nights, and not renew my seats in Section 415 which are nothing short of extortion on the part of the team. Unless the team goes deep into the playoffs for the next few seasons (which is unlikely) I see no way those seats returning the value to the people who buy them. They should drop the prices on those things. And fast.

I've had some pretty good years getting value out of my season tickets. The discount provided to season tickets have helped some years tremendously but the real value has come through season ticket holder benefits like the Monumental Rewards Program (now gone) and the Fluid Tickets Program (not gone but completely useless). I renewed my season tickets for three reasons this year: (1) next year is my 20th season and it's a nice round number, (2) some seasons I've attended a lot of games pretty cheaply so I'm OK overpaying for a couple of years at the end (that's such a terrible attitude by the way) and (3) maybe the team will win the draft lottery and tickets will become valuable again. I'll be watching next week for sure.